Chapter XIX: The “Savage” Psychopath

[Aaron Graf]

Chapter XIX: The “Savage” Psychopath
By Aaron Graf


If you thought Ann Coulter was a whacko, if you thought Bill O’Reilly was a dick, and if you thought that Rush Limbaugh was a fat racist blowhard, wait until you see the new right wing psycho. He’s all three of them combined, as well as a little bit of Pat Buchanan, Frankenstein’s monster, and Hitler tossed in for good measure. Here is the living breathing, walking, talking kind of a man that I truly fear, until you notice the bullshit in what he states.
Yes, I am talking about Michael Savage. That very guy who wants to deport all immigrants legal and illegal just because they’re not pure Americans, but yet his mother and father are immigrants. He says that liberals cheated in the 2000 election by putting in ballots of dead Spanish sailors and crack dealers. Of course, he does not provide any sources or evidence of that claim in his book, The Savage Nation. In quote he would say about the Florida ballot boxes:

Racist, because some blacks could say the ballots did not self punch Gore when sensing extra melanin on their hands. Racist because some elderly Jewish voters may have thought “Gore” meant “Gornisht” so they did not pick that presidential candidate.
The ballot machines were homophobic because some weak-wristed types had insufficient strength to press hard enough to register a vote ---- commonly referred to as a “pregnant chad.”<br>And, as we later learned, the ballot machines were sexist because they too, well, technical, favoring or “masculine” thought processes, thereby confusing some women.

I’m being nice to the readers here by showing him on a kinder attitude towards people of the non-straight-white Protestant male orientation. He writes worse than that about somebody who’s not native [Not Native American Indian] white American. I like this quote on page 122 of The Savage Nation that goes:

Not all immigrants are equal.
In the spirit of nationalism--which liberals consider the dirtiest word in the English language we must defend our borders against the dregs of society. And, we must use “racial profiling” to ferret out those who are already here who may also be planning to do us harm. “<br>
To prove himself America’s biggest nationalist [Bigger than Pat Buchanan] he opened up a group known as the Paul Revere Society whose only goal is to “defend our borders, our language, and our culture.” In other words, what he wants to do is throw out every person who made their way into this country back to where they came from, even if they’re legal. Then he wants to cripple our country by making everybody speak English [He says it’s multiculturalism and speaking other languages that cripple us, but yet he complains about suspicious looking Muslims]. As for the culture part, that means he wants to return us to the way we were in the fifties… with the women in the kitchen [whether they liked it or not], the boys on the football team and are all straight. The girls become cheerleaders, bake cookies for guys and give up a college education to get married and live in the suburbs where only white people are located. The fifties was nothing other than the biggest era of blind conformity. No matter how many people’s lives were ruined in the McCarthy trials, no matter how many blacks were lynched in the streets for trying to get food in a ‘white only’ restaurant, no matter how many girls were told that they should waste their lives away cooking pot roast for a family in the suburbs rather than become a doctor, and no matter how many homosexuals and bisexuals would be considered as evil and immoral in PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS it was suddenly, to him the greatest era of American history. Here’s a little gem from him I like on page 21 of The Savage Nation:

[Aaron Graf]

So let it be known I’m declaring war on liberal terrorism. Not halfway—all the way. That means right here, right now. Why? Because I hate these bums—the wacko left-wing maniacs, the Ninth Jerk-it Court of Schlemiels, and the illiberal politicians, those pieces of dried beef in suits—are doing to America the Beautiful.

On Page 71:

“The Founding Fathers guaranteed us “freedom of religion” not “freedom from religion”.”<br>
Later on down the page he would say:

“The alleged “wall of separation” doesn’t exist. It cannot be found in any constitutional documents. Period.”<br>
On page 53 in his section It’s A War, Stupid!

“You should know that the “peace movement” is nothing but a collaborationist movement and, like the Rats they are, they’re weakening the resolve of our troops, they’re undermining the public confidence in the war effort, and they should be detained for instigation of sedition.”<br>
On Page 67:

“You may think I’ve gone over the edge with this next statement. I don’t care. It’s the truth. I want a real war declared on terrorism. That means Americans must give up some civil liberties in order to catch those who would kill us and then we get our civil liberties back.
I’m not gonna mince words with you. I want racial profiling, and I want it now.”<br>
On 191 through one 192 he describes “Gores Contract Against America” and here is the way he sees it:

1. Homosexuals in the military or homosexual marriage
2. Affirmative action, or The Fairness for Dummies Act
3. Reparations for non-slaves by non-slaveholders
4. Hate-crime laws aimed at straight, white males
5. Racial profiling laws, aimed at straight, white police
6. A United Nations tax or a world tax
7. Free prescription drugs not only for the elderly but also for AIDS patients
8. Delegitimizing the Boy Scouts, or The Fairness to Predators Act
9. Outlawing home schooling or The Freedom from Learning Act
10. Arrest, ban, or rewrite the authentic Bible as a hate book
11. Mandatory application of Ritalin to any child with spunk, or The Security for Children Act
12. Complete elimination of borders with Mexico, or The Fairness to Latinos Act
13. Partial-birth abortion or infanticide and the sale of baby body parts, or The Senior Citizen Life Extension Act
14. Increased license for Hollywood’s violence and pornography, or The Freedom of Arts Act
15. Socialized medicine and a national health plan, or The Freedom from Bad Behavior Act
16. The No Limits on Lawsuits Act
17. Mandatory suicide for sick seniors, or The Saving Social Security Act
18. The Fairness in Talk Radio Act, i.e., the end of talk radio
19. The end of the Electoral College and the congressional redistricting of America to ensure that never again will the Demoncats be threatened, or The Once Dunce, One Vote Act
20. The complete seizing of all guns, or The Freedom from the Second Amendment Act
21. The abolition of our existing Constitution or The Freedom from Freedom Act

See what he’s doing on that last one I showed you? He doesn’t describe where he got the sources on this are from. If it were just sarcasm he wouldn’t put the up the Acts in Italics. When I first started writing this chapter on him I thought, “well, I already wrote up a chapter on some one who doesn’t believe in the first amendment [Coulter] and I’ve already wrote two chapters on a racist [Fuhrman]. What am I going to do?” Then for the hell of it I looked in the back of the book and I saw that there were no sources, and most of his sources in this book were second, no third hand information. No footnotes, no endnotes… how did I not see that? This guy must think his readers are mental midgets. As for that Italics thing I was saying. Normally when I writer describes something in Italics that happens to be describing something such as a law it must be based on an actual law. [Or at least for the common decency of your readers, I put my comments behind these brackets] For example; The Nineteenth Amendment, Roe v. Wade, Seinfeld, Public Enemy, Marilyn Manson, and Cunt: A Declaration of Independence. These are situations in which using Italics are necessary. Italics are also necessary when placing emphasis on something. Simply because it’s used to describe something that’s already in place. Seinfeld might not have been going on in real life, but it was a show on the teevee and a damn funny one. Roe V. Wade was used to describe a trial turned into law that legalizes abortions. The Nineteenth Amendment is used to describe a law in this country that can’t be reversed allowing women to vote. Public Enemy and Marilyn Manson are used to describe my two favorite bands growing up. However you have seen me call Marilyn Manson, Marilyn Manson. That’s because I’m referring to him by the name he’s been called since he was no longer known as Brian Warner instead of his band. Cunt: A Declaration of Independence is a book that without it I would still be watching the teevee to excessive periods of time. But when Michael Savage goes ahead and puts in description as The Once Dunce One Vote Act. That’s pretty misleading. Not because it’s something not true like the not in italics just written, but because to some people it might seem like it’s an act that was actually passed. Do you see what I mean? Don’t put it in italics if it’s not describing something, showing emphasis on something, or pointing out a name of an artist, station, etc. Most of his readers [In the terms of fans] probably think that’s an actual thing going on. Like “Oh my God! Gore’s trying to pass a Fairness to Dummies Act.” Not realizing that in a formal court I highly doubt they’ll pass a law using a slang term like dummies, if they were even describing affirmative action as being that. So right in that section he was being intentionally misleading. There are many other sections in his book The Savage Nation that are like this let’s look at a few.

[Aaron Graf]

Savage’s “Dog Meat” Section

On page 128 [Bold highlight mine]:

“Maybe you think my concerns are nothing but a big joke. Maybe you think I’m paranoid when I say we must not allow immigrants to come here and impose their cultural-trappings on us, rather than respect the American culture. Fine. You’re entitled to be wrong. The next time you’re in your backyard grilling hot dogs, don’t be surprised if your Korean neighbor is actually grilling his dog. That’s the way things are done in Korea.
You heard me correctly.
South Koreans defend their canine cuisine because they’ve been eating dogs for centuries. I’m sure this will give the idiots at PETA a heartburn, but Koreans raise dogs specifically for dining. You wouldn’t believe what dog meat they like the best: the Saint Bernard. Those big, beautiful dogs are raised to be chopped up. The idea of killing a Saint Bernard for food is, well, let’s just say I wouldn’t eat it myself. But that’s their society.”<br>-
In the section he rambles on more and more about his hatred towards Koreans because of a few guys who eat dogs he’s classifying all Koreans as dog-eating barbarians. Those reports are very rare, but when they happen, they just get a lot of attention. On to the point I was making. He states no sources for this bigotry, just paranoid delusions and stereotypes. He leaves no sources, or footnotes, or endnotes to back his hate speech on Koreans. Not one! And to think MSNBC thought he wasn’t going to do something completely stupid on air.


Michael Savage’s Radio Show


Here are transcripts from one episode of the Savage Nation when commenting on the Dixie Chick

Savage: Why is it that all the Hollywood idiots and the… uhh singing sluts go over seas and whisper. “You know what I really hate America, I hate the president, yeah I’m not like them.” I wonder why they do it over there. Why don’t they try it in Nashville? When they get up there and pretend they’re Americans. Why doesn’t one of the Dixie-sluts try it in Nashville, Tennessee. Sacremento, California. John your topic please, welcome.”<br>
John: Yeah Mike, uh, I was just wondering, if somebody doesn’t agree with you on the war you call them a slut is that….is that…is that what you do?

Savage: Well if somebody’s calling….if they call themselves the Dixie Chicks and they come across as country music girls selling the word Dixie which is usually associated with patriotism. And then they go over to England and they cut us in the back and they say that they’re ashamed that our president is from Texas. I would say that in a sense that’s sort of a prostitution both of their name, and the intent of their presentation. So therefore, the word slut applies.

John: How, years did you spend in the military Mike?

Savage: [Talking over John] How many years did you spend in the military John?

John: And your son?

Savage: John, John, how many years did you spend in the military John?!

John: I was born on an air force base.

Savage: [Interrupting again] John, how many years did you spend in the military, John?!

John: Four and I was born on a military base.

Savage: [Infuriated] Wait, wait, wait a minute. So what? So therefore everything you say is sacred? You’re still a dumbass. Have a nice day dumbass! Go marry one of those Dixie chicks. what do I care? You idiot! What the hell do I care if you’re in the military, what does that make you a genius? I mean look at the psychosis of this guy. He goes from that to this, that’s like something that has to do with the military. What does that have to do with the military moron?! Moron!!! Moron, moron, moron. Go gargle with rogaine! Go gargle with rogaine, grow a beard on your tongue, and don’t call talk shows, go buy Dixie chicks records.

[Aaron Graf]

Another statement he said to a gay caller and I quote the show, which was the reason he was kicked off of MSNBC:


SAVAGE: So you're one of those sodomists. Are you a sodomite?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes, I am.
SAVAGE: Oh, you're one of the sodomites. You should only get AIDS and die, you pig. How's that? Why don't you see if you can sue me, you pig. You got nothing better than to put me down, you piece of garbage. You have got nothing to do today, go eat a sausage and choke on it. Get trichinosis.
OK, do we have another nice caller here who's busy because he didn't have a nice night in the bathhouse who's angry at me today? Get me another one, put another sodomite on. No more calls out of-- let's go to the next scene. I don't care about these bums. They mean nothing to me. They're all sausages. Next scene; onto the next scene on the Savage Nation.

Can you say HATEFUL?! I sure can. It’s enough to make any sane minded person sick to their stomach. However, don’t think that his hatred on his radio show extends simply to a former veteran and a homosexual. With Savage that’s far from his normal specter of hatred. He even shows his lewd, odious, and cruel statements towards a well known rape and kidnapping case of Elizabeth Smart. Elizabeth Smart was taken from her home at knife point, held for nine months by a deranged lunatic and his wife, and repeatedly sexually abused and raped. Here are transcripts from his show on the first Hour Of March 18, 2003 Savage Nation Broadcast:

Savage [bold highlights mine]:

“So I’m going to talk about “Snow White Raped by a Bum in White Robes”<br>Now, the reason it’s a good story for me is simple. A) Because we suspected that Snow White had been nine months, uhhh---- Period. That’s A. The people were right all along.”<br>
Later on he states the following [bold highlights mine]:
Savage:
“Now we heard she was – from the family spokesman she was making cookies – doing a fashion show – slept holding her sister’s hand.
I said “Horse Crap!”<br>I’m sick of this public relations world I live in.
I wanna wretch.”<br>
Think that’s all I has to say about Elizabeth Smart? Oh think again if you think that is all he feels he must speak to people. Think again:

Savage [bold highlights mine]:

“Prosecutors said that when the trio reached the campsite–“ You heard this right?
You want some salacious news this afternoon? I’ll give it too-- If you’re brain dead from all the war talk.
“When the trio reached the campsite, Barzee tried to remove Elizabeth’s pajama’s.”<br>Oh this is so lewd!

That’s not the only thing he’ll do to a rape victim, there’s always more with Michael Savage:

Savage [bold highlights mine]:

“Barzee threatened to have Mitchell forcibly do it.” “Mitchell then” quote “raped or attempted to rape her or commit forcible sexual abuse against her, with Barzee’s help.” "At some point the girl was restrained with a cable around her foot that was tethered to a tree.”<br>Wow!
“The couple held Elizabeth against her will at the campsite with little or shelter, water, or food. Then they took her to California where they stayed—blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So you know the rest of the story.
“Mitchell told them he considered Elizabeth his wife and that her disappearance was a call from God, not a kidnapping.” That’s a novel excuse. That’s a very novel excuse.

I know, just when you think his hate speech on Elizabeth Smart was over, here’s more of it:

Savage:

“Family members have said repeatedly that Elizabeth was brainwashed.” Nonsense! “And that her loss of freewill prevented her from escaping despite several opportunities to do so.”<br>
Later into the episode Savage stated:

Savage [Bold Highlights mine]:

Chris Thomas the P.R. flak.
With a mocking monotone halting cadence, reads Thomas’ statement verbatim. “E-liz-a-beth was ta-ken a-gainst her will at knife point. She’s a mi-nor and what e-ver ra-tion-ale used to be-lieve that she was his wife and loved him is gross-ly mis-tak-en," said family spokesmouth Chris Thomas.
“The def-in-i-tion of love is not deg-ra-da-tion – hu-mil-i-a-tion – or rob-bing some-one’s life of con-trol and re-spect.”<br>Well most marriages that I know, in fact, ARE based upon degradation, humiliation, or robbing someone’s life of control and respect.
In fact, the only marriages that last, seem to be based upon “degradation, humiliation, or robbing someone’s life of control and respect.” It’s what makes marriage survive. [Chuckles, snorts, then laughs broadly.]

Good God Vlad, move on to another part of Savage’s ranting please. Sorry I’m sticking more heavily on this one for now. Yes there’s more of him on Elizabeth Smart:




The Lies, Distortions, and Just plain Idiocy in the “Trickle Down Immorality” Chapter

In the section Slut Vs. Virgins: America 2000 he refers to a PBS Frontline Report on a suburban community of Rockdale, Georgia where a bunch of teenage girls and their boyfriends got syphilis and almost caused an outbreak of the disease. Because the girls were having lots and lots and lots of group sex to the point where even I can say it’s too much. First thing’s first, the title of the report he put up. When you are expecting your readers to look this up and they check the title on the website they will find no Sluts Vs Virgins: America 2000 on any PBS Frontline report.

~ “What I assumed to be innocent girl talk turned out to be their bousting about “He did her while she did the other guy who was on top of her friend while she took his—“ etc., etc. It soon became obvious that they were not hookers. They just had bizarre sex for fun, not for money. According to them, it’s the “in” thing to do in their peer group.
The interviewer asked them how old they were when they lost their virginity. One said around thirteen or fourteen. The second said she was thirteen, and the third remembered that she was twelve at the time.
Instead of your heart going out to these youngsters, if you’re like me, you can’t help but feel revolted. There wasn’t an ounce of innocence left in any of them. They had become nothing but hardened, empty sex toys—and they were proud of it..
The scene then changed to three other girls about the same age, three Christian girls who were still virgins. Unlike the three sluts above, these three were outcasts in their high school because they believed there should be no sex outside marriage!
The world is this topsy-turvy because of the degeneracy of the likes of Bill Clinton and his followers. They think it’s normal for youngsters to be passed around like a used condom to male, female, underage, overage, all orifice “love” freaks. And they treat the three sixteen-year-olds, who are still virgins, like pariahs in their own school.”<br>
Actually the title of the report was called The Lost Children of Rockdale County. And the report took place on October 19, 1999. Not in 2000, As if that were not enough of being intentionally misleading. There were even a few things he didn’t mention like the one of the girls talking about how another girl did 30-40 guys in one night. But he didn’t mention how the guys were. Now the guys were something else. They treated the girls like they were total trash. I don’t care how easy they were, no girl has a right to be treated like she’s nothing because of her sex life, virgin or nonvirgin. Here’s something Michael Savage didn’t want to talk about.
INTERVIEWER: How did the guys in general treat the girls?
AMY: They were mean to them a lot. They treated them like they were just- I don't know, not trash, but not very, like, respectable. And the girls seemed not to care. I don't know why. I guess they just- I think most of it was the alcohol that they were buying because the guys always bought alcohol. They just- they knew that we would like it, and so- but they didn't treat us like we were anything real important.
INTERVIEWER: You never got angry at them?
AMY: I did a few times. But I couldn't really do anything about it because they just- they wouldn't care. They'd just tell me to go home or something.
INTERVIEWER: Why didn't you?
AMY: I don't know. I don't know. I just- I would be alone then.


Later on the following was stated about what some of these guys did that Savage was either too lazy to write upon or too steeped in an ideological agenda:

NARRATOR: One day when he was 14, D.J. and his friend, Joe, made a plan.
D.J.: We had a plan. We wanted to kill everybody, everybody in the world. We wanted to just- we wanted to try to set the record of the most murders you could ever imagine. So we got really drunk. I got really, really drunk, drank, like- together, we drank, like, a gallon of vodka, got really smashed.
We're hanging around all our friends, and there was just one guy that I really couldn't stand. I couldn't- just couldn't stand him at all. He was just the biggest- and he said something to me that pissed me off, said something horrible. And I just grabbed him, grabbed him by the back of his head, and I just stabbed him in the spine and threw him on the ground. And he was just sitting there, and he was bleeding.
And he gets up, and I went to grab his neck, just to- like, I wanted to cut his throat just to make sure it was over with, to kill him.
INTERVIEWER: How did it feel to stab him?
D.J.: At the time, it was- at the time, I- I- it felt great.
NARRATOR: The boy survived, and D.J. and his friend were never prosecuted.

[Aaron Graf]

What think that’s it? There’s more about these guys that Savage didn’t say about:

NARRATOR: D.J.'s friend, Miguel, has been a focus of the Rockdale Police for years, in and out of jail for petty crimes. The more time he spent behind bars, the greater his appeal to both boys and girls around Conyers.
INTERVIEWER: Tell me about Miguel.
AMY: Miguel. He was, like, the worst guy I ever met. He was, like, sort of the leader of this little gang thing. And everybody just looked up to him for some reason. I think that everybody was just scared of him.
D.J.: Miguel was- he was like my big brother. He was like my older brother. At the time, he was the most- I don't know. He was- everyone was terrified of him. So for him to be my big brother, for everybody to be then terrified of me.
MIGUEL: He was a younger kid. He was about 13, and I was about 17, 18. And usually, you know, an older kid wouldn't hang around nobody that young. But D.J. started- just started giving everybody money just to be a friend. And back then, I didn't have no job or nothing, and he would give me this money. And the money was- you know, I ain't going to lie, the money was good. He's my best friend.

Savage stated that when one of the girls that lost her virginity was twelve, it was true, but this is what he didn’t say about her losing her virginity:
HEATHER: The next thing I know, I wake up and I'm in a room, and I don't have my pants on and- so, I mean, I really couldn't call it rape because, you know, I put myself in that position in the first place. And I was only 12 years old, and I shouldn't have been out past that time anyway. And I shouldn't have been drinking or none of that. But you know, I was in a blackout, so I was going along with it. I just didn't know it.
PAT: She was 14 when she told me. But from what I'm understanding from her, she was 12 when she lost her virginity, which is just mind-boggling to me.

See, Savage does not even have respect for a rape victim. Yes, that was a rape, and it’s sad to me that her mother never taught her that such a thing is indeed a rape, and not her fault. He also didn’t mention that these girls had syphilis:

KEVIN: One guy would do it with her one night. the next night someone else has her, the next night someone else has her.
NARRATOR: -with the gravest of consequences-
CYNTHIA NOEL, R.N., Rockdale County Public Health Dept.: We saw syphilis, we saw genital warts, we saw herpes.

As for the little Christian girls. Those girls were not so great. In the interviews with them they were probably the most self righteous people I have ever seen. However nice they may have seemed, growing up around them that’s their cover for I’m better than you. Don’t believe me. Here’s the following to show you why they were outcasts in their school:

JENNIFER: I know where I stand. I know who I am in God. And nobody on this earth is going to be able to pull me off of that.
NARRATOR: Jennifer is 17. Her friends, Penie and Kira, are 16. They are devout Christians.
INTERVIEWER: Are you guys all virgins?
JENNIFER, KIRA, PENIE: Yes. Yes.
INTERVIEWER: Why? Why have you stayed virgins?
KIRA: Because that's- that's my morals that I live by. My parents have taught me from- since I was little that that's a good thing to do. I mean, it's just always been a right to me. It's always been right to save it.

When Savage blamed Bill Clinton for what happened, not only was that unfounded and just plain idiotic he also forgot to mention the parents in this book. When the interviewer asked the girls about whether or not their parents really did anything they said either their parents didn’t know they were doing that or they were denying it. It really is sad the way that Savage, a grown man has to pick on young girls to prove his hatefulness. It is truly sad about the way he “respects” women. It makes me sick. As for that CBS Frontline report. He didn’t cite down exactly the date of the report, nor did he cite down when it was and where I could get it. So after almost twelve hours of searching. I found the report. Ironically, after making a hippies of Mecca section where he blasted women for sleeping around again, he decided he’d do the biggest double standard on the subject a mere 5 pages later. A section called HOW TO PICK UP LIBERAL WOMEN. He basically told his readers he could try them in the book store… in the magazine section. Pretend you’re not interested in them. Just reach across and get something that they are picking up… then lean in and say ‘excuse me’. Then he told them they should always pretend that they think the war in Iraq was a scam to get oil. For the fun of it, I tried this for myself. But he was wrong. One, they can see through a faker, I let a couple conservative friends of mine do it themselves. Two, the magazine section has more conservatives than liberals. Most of the girls I’ve hooked up with happened to be in either the womens studies section of the bookstore, or from the anime section. But that’s my secret, my method, Savage had his and it obviously didn’t work. If it did he’d have a nice scandal on his hands and I’d have more to write on him over.

[Aaron Graf]

A Book the Savage Nation Is Almost a Replica Of

Those lies mentioned above take away the credibility of his writings in books like The Savage Nation or The Death of the White Man. No longer making them as something that analyzes fact with his own spunk, but rather as ideas; as his own state of philosophy. But are these philosophies his own? Did he copy someone else’s viewpoints and just put them in modern form? I decided to go and do a little scavenger hunt in the library through a writer with very similar ideas to his… infact too similar. But I’d rather not mention his name now, it will ruin the suspense. I’ll say his book when I’m done comparing and contrasting the two. I hope you don’t mind if I repeat some of the quotes I had earlier along with some new ones.



On Upholding Nationalistic Views

Other Author:

“If a people refuses to guard and uphold the qualities with which it has been endowed by Nature and which have their roots in the racial blood, then such a people has no right to complain over the loss of its earthly existence.”<br>
Savage:

“As I’ve said, a country is defined by her borders, language, and culture. Take our borders. Each time we admit someone from a country identified as a beehive of terrorism, we flirt with disaster. The president should issue an executive order that slams shut our borders to all immigration petitions, all student visas, and all tourism requests from Iraq, Iran, The Sudan, and any Krapistan that is on our list of terrorist nations.”<br>
On Anybody Against War

Other Author:

“He who would live must fight. He who does not wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.”<br>
Savage:

“[Referring again to peace activists] They’re the same plague and pox that almost destroyed this country from within in the 1960’s. They need to be constrained until the war effort is over. They can be detained for aiding and abetting the enemy under the laws governing sedition.
Yes, sedition exists. It’s time we constrained them. Save America. Bomb the five capitals of terrorism if they don’t stop their reign of murder and get this dirty war over with. And I’m not sorry if that sounds intolerant.

On Making White Men Seem Superior to Other Races

Other Author:

“Here is the answer is simple and clear. Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science and technical skill, which we see before our eyes today, is almost exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior type of humanity; therefore he represents the archetype of what we understand by the term: MAN.”<br>
Savage:

“If you eliminate, suppress, or debase the white male, you kill the goose that laid the golden egg. If you ace him out with “affirmative” action, exile him from the family, teach him that he’s a blight on mankind, then bon voyage to our society. We will devolve into a Third World cesspool. Where has there ever before in history been a group of human beings who have brought about the likes of the Magna Carta, the U.S. Constitution, and the countless life-saving and life-improving inventions that we now enjoy?”<br>
Religiously Oppressive Statements

Other Author:

“He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conduct is so appalling that one really cannot be surprised if in the imagination of our people the Jew is pictured as the incarnation of Satan and the symbol of evil.”<br>
Savage:

“Where do you think a Middle Eastern terrorist waiting to strike would go to hide?
I’ll give you four choices.
a. He’d hide among white Irish nuns.
b. He’d hide among albino mental cases.
c. He’d hide among orthodox Jews.
d. He’d hide in another unnamed community.

How about “d?”<br>Would that be good police work? Can we agree on that? Fine.
Then you send out the FBI and police and knock on every door. Do you have any visitors? Did anyone bring any strange packages? Who’s in the back room? We don’t care, we’re coming in. Shake them down. Toss the pillows around. You’ll find something or someone hiding in one of the closets. They’re swimming like fish in the ethnic communities where they blend in.”<br>
The words of Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf was the other author I was displaying to you. From his chapter on NATION and RACE

[Aaron Graf]

His Life He Boasts is Something He Didn’t Even Do

Michael Savage “brings all his interests into play through active debate with his callers, regardless of their political inclinations”, has a ““firewall balance” that limits how far to the right his opinions go”, and has a degree in medical botany and medical anthropology. He has written many peer reviewed columns and is an expert on medicinal plants. According to Savage, he turned to right wing politics because when he tried to find employment in Academic Anthropology he couldn’t because he was a white male as he frequently claims. He also says that he has written many books on herbal medicines such as Herbs That Heal and others.
Actually, his real name is Michael A. Weiner. He got a degree in Ethno Botany and has no peer reviewed columns, articles or anything. That kind of rules out the whole qualification for Academic Anthropology or Ethno Botany doesn’t it? Not to mention the fact that in Ethno Botany there are few people who are not white and only a small portion of women in that field. That’s kind of a low blow for him right there because the entire profession that he’s actually in is filled with one too many white men. When his listeners call in and even show the slightest sign of disagreement to his nazi views he pitches a fit in the manner of a little six year old screaming “your stupid!” Then there’s that whole “firewall of balance” on how far to the right his opinions go. From the descriptions of the man’s blatant racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, and having his writing almost matching that of Adolf Hitler’s; you’re right, he does try to limit how far to the right he goes because if he went any further he’d be wearing big white sheets over him, hanging black men and immigrants to a tree, and burning crosses in their backyards. Actually he’d have the red sheets, you know, the ones that the Grand Wizards wear. So in the end who is this man? A racist quack doctor who doesn’t even know his real name.